AW: Wonly-top-basic-asm

[David Wohlferd]

On 2/11/2016 8:03 AM, Sandra Loosemore wrote:
> On 02/11/2016 08:40 AM, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
>
>> But again, if someone feels the docs patch as posted is preferrable, go
>> ahead and approve it (for stage1 I assume).
>
> TBH, I haven't looked at the documentation patch at all; I've been 
> ignoring this issue because (a) I thought the technical details were 
> still under discussion and (b) adding a new command-line option is 
> stage 1 material not suitable to commit right now anyway.
>
> I'll take a look at the docs once the name and behavior of the new 
> option have been settled upon.

So far, no one has suggested any changes to the behavior.  And we seem 
to have settled on a name.

dw