AW: Wonly-top-basic-asm

David Wohlferd dw@LimeGreenSocks.com
Mon Feb 8 20:15:00 GMT 2016


On 2/7/2016 10:45 PM, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
> On 8. 2. 2016 04:45, David Wohlferd wrote:
>> I replied with a patch that includes most of the changes you asked for
>> (see inline below).  Were you waiting on me for something more?
> ChangeLog entries are still missing.

I'll add them back in the next post.

> David, there is a tool that you can use to check the patch
> for some style-nits before submission.

I was not aware of this tool.  I'll fix these before the next post.

At one point you proposed renaming the option -Wbasic-asm.  This seemed 
a little terse (and possibly misleading) so I counter-proposed 
-Wbasic-asm-in-function (a little verbose, but clearer).  I have no 
strong preferences here, and you haven't said one way or the other.  Are 
we just going to stick with -Wonly-top-basic-asm?

Hopefully one more try and this will be done.

Thanks,
dw



More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list