Mon Feb 8 20:15:00 GMT 2016
On 2/7/2016 10:45 PM, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
> On 8. 2. 2016 04:45, David Wohlferd wrote:
>> I replied with a patch that includes most of the changes you asked for
>> (see inline below). Were you waiting on me for something more?
> ChangeLog entries are still missing.
I'll add them back in the next post.
> David, there is a tool that you can use to check the patch
> for some style-nits before submission.
I was not aware of this tool. I'll fix these before the next post.
At one point you proposed renaming the option -Wbasic-asm. This seemed
a little terse (and possibly misleading) so I counter-proposed
-Wbasic-asm-in-function (a little verbose, but clearer). I have no
strong preferences here, and you haven't said one way or the other. Are
we just going to stick with -Wonly-top-basic-asm?
Hopefully one more try and this will be done.
More information about the Gcc-patches