PR 69577: Invalid RA of destination subregs

Richard Sandiford richard.sandiford@arm.com
Tue Feb 2 17:57:00 GMT 2016


[Resending without disclaimer, sorry]

Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com> writes:
> On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 5:54 PM, Kyrill Tkachov
> <kyrylo.tkachov@foss.arm.com> wrote:
>> Hi Richard,
>>
>>
>> On 02/02/16 14:56, Richard Sandiford wrote:
>>>
>>> In PR 69577 we have:
>>>
>>>    A: (set (reg:V2TI X) ...)
>>>    B: (set (subreg:TI (reg:V2TI X) 0) ...)
>>>
>>> X gets allocated to an AVX register, as usual for V2TI.  The problem is
>>> that the movti for B doesn't then preserve the other half of X, even
>>> though the subreg semantics are supposed to guarantee that.
>>>
>>> If instead the same value had been set by:
>>>
>>>    A': (set (subreg:TI (reg:V2TI X) 16) ...)
>>>    B: (set (subreg:TI (reg:V2TI X) 0) ...)
>>>
>>> the subreg in A' would have prevented the use of AVX registers for X,
>>> since you can't directly access the high part.
>>>
>>> IMO these are really the same thing.  An alternative way to view it
>>> is that the original sequence is equivalent to:
>>>
>>>    A: (set (reg:V2TI X) ...)
>>>    B1: (set (subreg:TI (reg:V2TI X) 0) ...)
>>>    B2: (set (subreg:TI (reg:V2TI X) 16) (subreg:TI (reg:V2TI X) 16))
>>>
>>> in which B2 is a no-op and therefore implicit.  The handling ought
>>> to be the same regardless of whether there is an rtl insn that
>>> explicitly assigns to (subreg:TI (reg:V2TI X) 16).
>>>
>>> This patch implements that idea.  Hopefully the comments explain
>>> what's going on.
>>>
>>> Tested on x86_64-linux-gnu so far.  Will test on aarch64-linux-gnu and
>>> arm-linux-gnueabihf as well.  OK to install if the additional testing
>>> succeeds?
>>
>>
>> For me this patch causes an ICE when building libgcc during an
>> aarch64-none-elf build.
>> It's a segfault with the trace:
>> 0xb0ac2a crash_signal
>>         $SRC/gcc/toplev.c:335
>> 0xa7cfd7 init_subregs_of_mode()
>>         $SRC/gcc/reginfo.c:1345
>> 0x96fc4b init_costs
>>         $SRC/gcc/ira-costs.c:2187
>> 0x97419e ira_set_pseudo_classes(bool, _IO_FILE*)
>>         $SRC/gcc/ira-costs.c:2237
>> 0x106fd1e alloc_global_sched_pressure_data
>>         $SRC/gcc/haifa-sched.c:7244
>> 0x106fd1e sched_init()
>>         $SRC/gcc/haifa-sched.c:7394
>> 0x107109a haifa_sched_init()
>>         $SRC/gcc/haifa-sched.c:7406
>> 0xab37ac schedule_insns()
>>         $SRC/gcc/sched-rgn.c:3504
>> 0xab3f5b rest_of_handle_sched
>>         $SRC/gcc/sched-rgn.c:3717
>> 0xab3f5b execute
>>         $SRC/gcc/sched-rgn.c:3825
>
> Also on x86_64-linux-gnu when building -m32 multilib:
>
> Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
> 0x0000000000d28264 in init_subregs_of_mode () at
> /home/uros/gcc-svn/trunk/gcc/reginfo.c:1345
> 1345            FOR_EACH_INSN_DEF (def, insn)
> (gdb) p insn
> $1 = (rtx_insn *) 0x7fffef9f4d40
> (gdb) p debug_rtx (insn)
> (code_label 60 31 39 10 9 "" [3 uses])
> $2 = void
> (gdb) p def
> $3 = (df_ref) 0x0

Bah, sorry.  I test with --enable-checking=yes,rtl,df, and it turns out
that df checking masks this kind of problem.  -m32 builds (and tests)
fine with it but not without.

Here's the patch again with the obvious fix.  Retesting now with just
--enable-checking=yes,rtl.

Thanks,
Richard


gcc/
	PR rtl-optimization/69577
	* reginfo.c (record_subregs_of_mode): Add a partial_def parameter.
	(find_subregs_of_mode): Update accordingly.  Iterate over partial
	definitions.

gcc/testsuite/
	PR rtl-optimization/69577
	* gcc.target/i386/pr69577.c: New test.

diff --git a/gcc/reginfo.c b/gcc/reginfo.c
index 6814eed..ccf53bf 100644
--- a/gcc/reginfo.c
+++ b/gcc/reginfo.c
@@ -1244,8 +1244,16 @@ simplifiable_subregs (const subreg_shape &shape)
 static HARD_REG_SET **valid_mode_changes;
 static obstack valid_mode_changes_obstack;
 
+/* Restrict the choice of register for SUBREG_REG (SUBREG) based
+   on information about SUBREG.
+
+   If PARTIAL_DEF, SUBREG is a partial definition of a multipart inner
+   register and we want to ensure that the other parts of the inner
+   register are correctly preserved.  If !PARTIAL_DEF we need to
+   ensure that SUBREG itself can be formed.  */
+
 static void
-record_subregs_of_mode (rtx subreg)
+record_subregs_of_mode (rtx subreg, bool partial_def)
 {
   unsigned int regno;
 
@@ -1256,15 +1264,41 @@ record_subregs_of_mode (rtx subreg)
   if (regno < FIRST_PSEUDO_REGISTER)
     return;
 
+  subreg_shape shape (shape_of_subreg (subreg));
+  if (partial_def)
+    {
+      /* The number of independently-accessible SHAPE.outer_mode values
+	 in SHAPE.inner_mode is GET_MODE_SIZE (SHAPE.inner_mode) / SIZE.
+	 We need to check that the assignment will preserve all the other
+	 SIZE-byte chunks in the inner register besides the one that
+	 includes SUBREG.
+
+	 In practice it is enough to check whether an equivalent
+	 SHAPE.inner_mode value in an adjacent SIZE-byte chunk can be formed.
+	 If the underlying registers are small enough, both subregs will
+	 be valid.  If the underlying registers are too large, one of the
+	 subregs will be invalid.
+
+	 This relies on the fact that we've already been passed
+	 SUBREG with PARTIAL_DEF set to false.  */
+      unsigned int size = MAX (REGMODE_NATURAL_SIZE (shape.inner_mode),
+			       GET_MODE_SIZE (shape.outer_mode));
+      gcc_checking_assert (size < GET_MODE_SIZE (shape.inner_mode));
+      if (shape.offset >= size)
+	shape.offset -= size;
+      else
+	shape.offset += size;
+    }
+
   if (valid_mode_changes[regno])
     AND_HARD_REG_SET (*valid_mode_changes[regno],
-		      simplifiable_subregs (shape_of_subreg (subreg)));
+		      simplifiable_subregs (shape));
   else
     {
       valid_mode_changes[regno]
 	= XOBNEW (&valid_mode_changes_obstack, HARD_REG_SET);
       COPY_HARD_REG_SET (*valid_mode_changes[regno],
-			 simplifiable_subregs (shape_of_subreg (subreg)));
+			 simplifiable_subregs (shape));
     }
 }
 
@@ -1277,7 +1311,7 @@ find_subregs_of_mode (rtx x)
   int i;
 
   if (code == SUBREG)
-    record_subregs_of_mode (x);
+    record_subregs_of_mode (x, false);
 
   /* Time for some deep diving.  */
   for (i = GET_RTX_LENGTH (code) - 1; i >= 0; i--)
@@ -1305,7 +1339,14 @@ init_subregs_of_mode (void)
   FOR_EACH_BB_FN (bb, cfun)
     FOR_BB_INSNS (bb, insn)
       if (NONDEBUG_INSN_P (insn))
-        find_subregs_of_mode (PATTERN (insn));
+	{
+	  find_subregs_of_mode (PATTERN (insn));
+	  df_ref def;
+	  FOR_EACH_INSN_DEF (def, insn)
+	    if (DF_REF_FLAGS_IS_SET (def, DF_REF_PARTIAL)
+		&& df_read_modify_subreg_p (DF_REF_REG (def)))
+	      record_subregs_of_mode (DF_REF_REG (def), true);
+	}
 }
 
 const HARD_REG_SET *
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr69577.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr69577.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..d680539
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr69577.c
@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+/* { dg-do run } */
+/* { dg-require-effective-target avx } */
+/* { dg-require-effective-target int128 } */
+/* { dg-options "-O -fno-forward-propagate -fno-split-wide-types -mavx" } */
+
+typedef unsigned int u32;
+typedef unsigned __int128 u128;
+typedef unsigned __int128 v32u128 __attribute__ ((vector_size (32)));
+
+u128 __attribute__ ((noinline, noclone))
+foo (u32 u32_0, v32u128 v32u128_0)
+{
+  v32u128_0[0] >>= u32_0;
+  v32u128_0 += (v32u128) {u32_0, 0};
+  return u32_0 + v32u128_0[0] + v32u128_0[1];
+}
+
+int
+main()
+{
+  u128 x = foo (1, (v32u128) {1, 4});
+  if (x != 6)
+    __builtin_abort ();
+  return 0;
+}



More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list