[PATCH 3/4] [ARC] Refurbish mul64 support.

Claudiu Zissulescu Claudiu.Zissulescu@synopsys.com
Fri Dec 16 13:25:00 GMT 2016


Committed with the suggested mods.
Thank you for ur review,
Claudiu

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andrew Burgess [mailto:andrew.burgess@embecosm.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2016 2:01 PM
> To: Claudiu Zissulescu <Claudiu.Zissulescu@synopsys.com>
> Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; Francois.Bedard@synopsys.com
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] [ARC] Refurbish mul64 support.
> 
> * Claudiu Zissulescu <Claudiu.Zissulescu@synopsys.com> [2016-11-16
> 11:18:00 +0100]:
> 
> > gcc/
> > 2016-07-04  Claudiu Zissulescu  <claziss@synopsys.com>
> >
> > 	* config/arc/arc.md (mulsidi_600): Changed.
> > 	(umulsidi_600): Likewise.
> > 	(mul64): New pattern.
> > 	(mulu64): Likewise.
> > 	(mulsidi3): Changed.
> > 	(umulsidi3): Likewise.
> 
> As always the changelog description is pretty limited.  Remember, it's
> a _change_ log, if you mention something I already know it's changed,
> better to say what has changed.  Here's what I'd write for this patch:
> 
> 	* config/arc/arc.md (mulsidi_600): Change to insn_and_split,
> 	generate new mul64 insn for core multiplication work.
> 	(umulsidi_600): Likewise, but generate mulu64 insn.
> 	(mul64): New insn pattern, content largely taken from old
> 	mulsidi_600 insn pattern.
> 	(mulu64): Likewise, but content from old umulsidi_600
> 	pattern.
> 	(mulsidi3): Remove move to destination, this is now handled by
> 	mulsidi_600 insn_and_split.
> 	(umulsidi3): Likewise, but using new umulsidi_600.
> 
> It never hurts (I think) to include a longer description of the change
> with the commit, especially when the commit should produce no user
> visible change in the final result and is just a clean up.  This has
> two benefits I think, first, if we do ever track a bug back to this
> commit (and the commit log say that no user visible changes are
> expected) then we know, with 100% certainty, that this was a mistake
> and not just an unfortunate side effect of an intended change.
> Second, stating that no user visible changes are expected explains why
> there are no tests with the patch; the assumption would be that the
> functionality is already covered by existing tests.
> 
> Here's what I'd write for this commit:
> 
> 	Rework 64-bit multiplication patterns
> 
>         Previously users of mulsidi_600 and umulsidi_600 had to take
>         care of moving the multiplication result into the final
>         destination themselves (from the MUL64_OUT_REG register).
>         This commit converts these two instruction patterns into
>         insn_and_split patterns that now take the final destination as
>         an extra operand.  The insn_and_split patterns generate the
>         multiplication using two new multiplication instruction
>         patterns, then generate the move of the result from the
>         MUL64_OUT_REG register into the final destination.
> 
>         This is a clean up commit, there should be no user visible
>         changes after this commit.
> 
> I tend to prefer move verbose commit logs, which are not to everyones
> taste, but I'm sure there's some middle ground we can find between my
> ultra-verbose style and your ultra-brief style :)
> 
> But otherwise, this looks fine.
> 
> Thanks,
> Andrew
> 
> 
> > ---
> >  gcc/config/arc/arc.md | 64 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> ------------
> >  1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/gcc/config/arc/arc.md b/gcc/config/arc/arc.md
> > index 86de423..76a3207 100644
> > --- a/gcc/config/arc/arc.md
> > +++ b/gcc/config/arc/arc.md
> > @@ -12,10 +12,6 @@
> >  ;;    Profiling support and performance improvements by
> >  ;;    Joern Rennecke (joern.rennecke@embecosm.com)
> >  ;;
> > -;;    Support for DSP multiply instructions and mul64
> > -;;    instructions for ARC600; and improvements in flag setting
> > -;;    instructions by
> > -;;    Muhammad Khurram Riaz (Khurram.Riaz@arc.com)
> >
> >  ;; This file is part of GCC.
> >
> > @@ -2011,14 +2007,26 @@
> >    [(set_attr "is_sfunc" "yes")
> >     (set_attr "predicable" "yes")])
> >
> > -(define_insn "mulsidi_600"
> > +(define_insn_and_split "mulsidi_600"
> > +  [(set (match_operand:DI 0 "register_operand"                               "=c, c,c,
> c")
> > +	(mult:DI (sign_extend:DI (match_operand:SI 1 "register_operand"
> "%Rcq#q, c,c,  c"))
> > +		 (sign_extend:DI (match_operand:SI 2
> "nonmemory_operand"  "Rcq#q,cL,L,C32"))))
> > +   (clobber (reg:DI MUL64_OUT_REG))]
> > +  "TARGET_MUL64_SET"
> > +  "#"
> > +  "TARGET_MUL64_SET"
> > +  [(const_int 0)]
> > +  "emit_insn (gen_mul64 (operands[1], operands[2]));
> > +   emit_move_insn (operands[0], gen_rtx_REG (DImode,
> MUL64_OUT_REG));
> > +   DONE;"
> > +  [(set_attr "type" "multi")
> > +   (set_attr "length" "8")])
> > +
> > +(define_insn "mul64"
> >    [(set (reg:DI MUL64_OUT_REG)
> > -	(mult:DI (sign_extend:DI
> > -		   (match_operand:SI 0 "register_operand"  "%Rcq#q,c,c,c"))
> > -		 (sign_extend:DI
> > -; assembler issue for "I", see mulsi_600
> > -;		   (match_operand:SI 1 "register_operand"
> "Rcq#q,cL,I,Cal"))))]
> > -		   (match_operand:SI 1 "register_operand"
> "Rcq#q,cL,L,C32"))))]
> > +	(mult:DI
> > +	 (sign_extend:DI (match_operand:SI 0 "register_operand" "%Rcq#q,
> c,c,  c"))
> > +	 (sign_extend:DI (match_operand:SI 1 "nonmemory_operand"
> "Rcq#q,cL,L,C32"))))]
> >    "TARGET_MUL64_SET"
> >    "mul64%? \t0, %0, %1%&"
> >    [(set_attr "length" "*,4,4,8")
> > @@ -2027,14 +2035,26 @@
> >     (set_attr "predicable" "yes,yes,no,yes")
> >     (set_attr "cond" "canuse,canuse,canuse_limm,canuse")])
> >
> > -(define_insn "umulsidi_600"
> > +(define_insn_and_split "umulsidi_600"
> > +  [(set (match_operand:DI 0 "register_operand"                            "=c,c, c")
> > +	(mult:DI (zero_extend:DI (match_operand:SI 1 "register_operand"
> "%c,c, c"))
> > +		 (sign_extend:DI (match_operand:SI 2
> "nonmemory_operand"  "cL,L,C32"))))
> > +   (clobber (reg:DI MUL64_OUT_REG))]
> > +  "TARGET_MUL64_SET"
> > +  "#"
> > +  "TARGET_MUL64_SET"
> > +  [(const_int 0)]
> > +  "emit_insn (gen_mulu64 (operands[1], operands[2]));
> > +   emit_move_insn (operands[0], gen_rtx_REG (DImode,
> MUL64_OUT_REG));
> > +   DONE;"
> > +  [(set_attr "type" "umulti")
> > +   (set_attr "length" "8")])
> > +
> > +(define_insn "mulu64"
> >    [(set (reg:DI MUL64_OUT_REG)
> > -	(mult:DI (zero_extend:DI
> > -		   (match_operand:SI 0 "register_operand"  "%c,c,c"))
> > -		 (sign_extend:DI
> > -; assembler issue for "I", see mulsi_600
> > -;		   (match_operand:SI 1 "register_operand" "cL,I,Cal"))))]
> > -		   (match_operand:SI 1 "register_operand" "cL,L,C32"))))]
> > +	(mult:DI
> > +	 (zero_extend:DI (match_operand:SI 0 "register_operand"  "%c,c,c"))
> > +	 (zero_extend:DI (match_operand:SI 1 "nonmemory_operand"
> "cL,L,C32"))))]
> >    "TARGET_MUL64_SET"
> >    "mulu64%? \t0, %0, %1%&"
> >    [(set_attr "length" "4,4,8")
> > @@ -2098,9 +2118,7 @@
> >      }
> >    else if (TARGET_MUL64_SET)
> >      {
> > -      operands[2] = force_reg (SImode, operands[2]);
> > -      emit_insn (gen_mulsidi_600 (operands[1], operands[2]));
> > -      emit_move_insn (operands[0], gen_rtx_REG (DImode,
> MUL64_OUT_REG));
> > +      emit_insn (gen_mulsidi_600 (operands[0], operands[1], operands[2]));
> >        DONE;
> >      }
> >    else if (TARGET_MULMAC_32BY16_SET)
> > @@ -2332,9 +2350,7 @@
> >      }
> >    else if (TARGET_MUL64_SET)
> >      {
> > -      operands[2] = force_reg (SImode, operands[2]);
> > -      emit_insn (gen_umulsidi_600 (operands[1], operands[2]));
> > -      emit_move_insn (operands[0], gen_rtx_REG (DImode,
> MUL64_OUT_REG));
> > +      emit_insn (gen_umulsidi_600 (operands[0], operands[1],
> operands[2]));
> >        DONE;
> >      }
> >    else if (TARGET_MULMAC_32BY16_SET)
> > --
> > 1.9.1
> >



More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list