[PATCH] Small cleanups to use gimple_call_noreturn_p
Richard Biener
rguenther@suse.de
Wed Aug 17 14:22:00 GMT 2016
On Wed, 17 Aug 2016, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I've noticed a couple of places that should be using
> gimple_call_noreturn_p but are using gimple_call_flags (stmt) & ECF_NORETURN
> instead.
>
> Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for trunk?
Ok.
Richard.
> 2016-08-17 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
>
> * gimple-fold.c (gimple_fold_call): Use gimple_call_noreturn_p
> instead of testing ECF_NORETURN bit in gimple_call_flags.
> * tree-cfg.c (make_edges_bb, execute_fixup_cfg): Likewise.
> * predict.c (tree_bb_level_predictions): Likewise.
> * gimple-low.c (gimple_stmt_may_fallthru): Likewise.
>
> --- gcc/gimple-fold.c.jj 2016-07-19 19:29:05.250752770 +0200
> +++ gcc/gimple-fold.c 2016-08-17 13:34:21.209544835 +0200
> @@ -3184,7 +3184,7 @@ gimple_fold_call (gimple_stmt_iterator *
> /* If changing the call to __cxa_pure_virtual
> or similar noreturn function, adjust gimple_call_fntype
> too. */
> - if ((gimple_call_flags (stmt) & ECF_NORETURN)
> + if (gimple_call_noreturn_p (stmt)
> && VOID_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (TREE_TYPE (fndecl)))
> && TYPE_ARG_TYPES (TREE_TYPE (fndecl))
> && (TREE_VALUE (TYPE_ARG_TYPES (TREE_TYPE (fndecl)))
> --- gcc/tree-cfg.c.jj 2016-08-16 18:50:14.918137409 +0200
> +++ gcc/tree-cfg.c 2016-08-17 13:35:49.059419876 +0200
> @@ -807,7 +807,7 @@ make_edges_bb (basic_block bb, struct om
> }
> /* Some calls are known not to return. */
> else
> - fallthru = !(gimple_call_flags (last) & ECF_NORETURN);
> + fallthru = !gimple_call_noreturn_p (last);
> break;
>
> case GIMPLE_ASSIGN:
> @@ -9083,7 +9083,7 @@ execute_fixup_cfg (void)
> if (!stmt
> || (!is_ctrl_stmt (stmt)
> && (!is_gimple_call (stmt)
> - || (gimple_call_flags (stmt) & ECF_NORETURN) == 0)))
> + || !gimple_call_noreturn_p (stmt))))
> {
> if (stmt && is_gimple_call (stmt))
> gimple_call_set_ctrl_altering (stmt, false);
> --- gcc/predict.c.jj 2016-08-06 12:11:52.254489381 +0200
> +++ gcc/predict.c 2016-08-17 13:35:12.365889754 +0200
> @@ -2639,8 +2639,7 @@ tree_bb_level_predictions (void)
>
> if (is_gimple_call (stmt))
> {
> - if ((gimple_call_flags (stmt) & ECF_NORETURN)
> - && has_return_edges)
> + if (gimple_call_noreturn_p (stmt) && has_return_edges)
> predict_paths_leading_to (bb, PRED_NORETURN,
> NOT_TAKEN);
> decl = gimple_call_fndecl (stmt);
> --- gcc/gimple-low.c.jj 2016-05-03 14:12:19.053019350 +0200
> +++ gcc/gimple-low.c 2016-08-17 13:34:54.813114525 +0200
> @@ -610,7 +610,7 @@ gimple_stmt_may_fallthru (gimple *stmt)
>
> case GIMPLE_CALL:
> /* Functions that do not return do not fall through. */
> - return (gimple_call_flags (stmt) & ECF_NORETURN) == 0;
> + return !gimple_call_noreturn_p (stmt);
>
> default:
> return true;
>
> Jakub
>
>
--
Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
SUSE LINUX GmbH, GF: Felix Imendoerffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, HRB 21284 (AG Nuernberg)
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list