Implement -Wimplicit-fallthrough: core
Joseph Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com
Fri Aug 12 15:59:00 GMT 2016
On Fri, 12 Aug 2016, Marek Polacek wrote:
> Not sure if error is appropriate here, or whether I should downgrade the
> error to a warning and ignore the attribute.
I'd say the semantics for uses of attributes that currently parse should
remain unchanged: they should not be reinterpreted (for non-fallthrough
attributes) to be attributes on a statement rather than on an empty
declaration.
--
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list