[PATCH build/doc] Replacing libiberty with gnulib

Pedro Alves palves@redhat.com
Wed Aug 10 14:25:00 GMT 2016


On 08/10/2016 03:06 PM, Pedro Alves wrote:

> Since you're problably going to use sed to patch the files, including
> some new file instead of config.h should be about the same work.

Note, above I was assuming that if you include the gnulib config.h file
in system.h, then you're going to move the inclusion of gcc's own
config.h to system.h as well, to keep the inclusions nicely together, like
gdb does.  Obviously if you leave gcc's config.h inclusions where
they are, then it's a smaller patch.  Maybe start with just changing
system.h, and leave removing all the current config.h inclusions
to a separate pass later (but not never).

> Up to gcc maintainers to decide.

Thanks,
Pedro Alves



More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list