[PATCH] Convert SPARC to LRA

Mike Stump mikestump@comcast.net
Mon Sep 28 18:49:00 GMT 2015


On Sep 27, 2015, at 6:29 PM, Jeff Law <law@redhat.com> wrote:
> I don't think we're there yet either -- many ports still require some guidance from Vlad to get working with LRA.
> 
> It *may* be time to decree that any new ports must use the LRA path rather than reload.  I'm still on the fence with that.

So, I think it makes sense to change the default for LRA to on now.  Port maintainers for which this isn’t the right choice (sh, cause code size regressions), can then default it to off in the port.  We can then use the #define LRA in the port as an indicator that things are not fine on that port and ideally LRA should be enhanced to make the port work better.  When no port has a #define left, we can then safely rm -rf all the non-LRA code.


More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list