[PATCH 00/10] removal of typedefs that hide pointerness episode 1
Thu Sep 10 15:30:00 GMT 2015
On Thu, 2015-09-03 at 11:48 +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 7:26 AM, <email@example.com> wrote:
> > From: Trevor Saunders <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> > Hi,
> > Personally I think hiding that variables are pointers is confusing, and I
> > believe consensus is we should move away from this style. So this series
> > starts to do that.
> Btw, what happened to the promised gimple -> gimple * conversion?
My recollection is that we hoped to do that after GCC 5 stage 1 closed
(to avoid breaking people's development branchs), and I think I got
distracted by other things (probably the jit).
I'm working on a big revamp of diagnostics (underlined ranges, fixit
hints, etc) that I hope to get in for GCC 6 stage 1 and am trying to
focus on that right now.
If you think it's still worth doing the gimple -> gimple * conversion
(presumably for immediately after close of stage 1), I can try out my
[snip discussion of Trevor's patches]
More information about the Gcc-patches