PING: [PATCH] PR target/67215: -fno-plt needs improvements for x86

[Ramana Radhakrishnan]

On 29/10/15 01:47, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 6:21 PM, Bernd Schmidt <bschmidt@redhat.com> wrote:
>> On 10/29/2015 02:14 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 6:11 PM, Bernd Schmidt <bschmidt@redhat.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 10/29/2015 02:10 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 5:23 PM, Jeff Law <law@redhat.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So I'll ask again, why did you commit a patch which you clearly knew
>>>>>> did
>>>>>> not
>>>>>> meet the conditions Bernd set forth for approval?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I believed that aarch64 backend didn't properly handle -fno-plt,
>>>>> which shouldn't block my patch.
>>
>>
>> Actually this is even worse than I thought because it sounds like you're
>> saying you knowingly checked something in while being aware it would break
>> another port.
>>
> 
> Only when -fno-plt was used.

So, that's a target independent feature in GCC ! So, I don't see how that
justifies the commit.


>> 
>> Sometimes It seems that it is the only way to get attention from the
>> community.  BTW, my patch was submitted in August.
>> 

I personally do *not* understand how that is an excuse. 

regards
Ramana