PING: [PATCH] PR target/67215: -fno-plt needs improvements for x86

H.J. Lu hjl.tools@gmail.com
Thu Oct 29 03:39:00 GMT 2015


On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 6:21 PM, Bernd Schmidt <bschmidt@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 10/29/2015 02:14 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 6:11 PM, Bernd Schmidt <bschmidt@redhat.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 10/29/2015 02:10 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 5:23 PM, Jeff Law <law@redhat.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> So I'll ask again, why did you commit a patch which you clearly knew
>>>>> did
>>>>> not
>>>>> meet the conditions Bernd set forth for approval?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I believed that aarch64 backend didn't properly handle -fno-plt,
>>>> which shouldn't block my patch.
>
>
> Actually this is even worse than I thought because it sounds like you're
> saying you knowingly checked something in while being aware it would break
> another port.
>

Only when -fno-plt was used.

H.J.



More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list