[Patch, Fortran, 66927, v2.1] [6 Regression] ICE in gfc_conf_procedure_call

[Andre Vehreschild]

Hi Paul,

thanks for the quick review. Submitted as r229353.

Many thanks and regards,
	Andre

On Mon, 26 Oct 2015 13:04:27 +0100
Paul Richard Thomas <paul.richard.thomas@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Andre,
> 
> Yes, that's good to fix the problem. OK to commit
> 
> Thanks for the rapid fix.
> 
> Paul
> 
> On 26 October 2015 at 11:03, Andre Vehreschild <vehre@gmx.de> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > unfortunately did my last patch create a segfault on some 32-bit
> > system. This happens because in the scalarizer the lower bound of the
> > deferred length array of the source= expression was taken to be
> > constant zero instead of taking that information from the array
> > descriptor. This patch fixes the segfault by taking the lower -- and to
> > keep it in sync also the upper -- bound from the array descriptor when
> > doing the array assign in the allocate ().
> >
> > Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-linux-gnu/f21.
> >
> > Ok for trunk?
> >
> > Sorry for the regression.
> >
> > Regards,
> >         Andre
> >
> > On Sun, 25 Oct 2015 13:31:02 +0100
> > Andre Vehreschild <vehre@gmx.de> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Paul, hi all,
> >>
> >> thanks for the review. Submitted as r229294.
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >>       Andre
> >>
> >> On Sun, 25 Oct 2015 08:43:24 +0100
> >> Paul Richard Thomas <paul.richard.thomas@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Dear Andre,
> >> >
> >> > As far as I can see, the problems with PR57117 are specific to RESHAPE
> >> > and need not affect committing your patch. To my surprise, the
> >> > combination of your patch and mine for PR67171 fixes PR67044 in that
> >> > the ICE no longer occurs. I have to get my head around how to write a
> >> > testcase for it that tests the functionality though!
> >> >
> >> > You can commit this patch to trunk. As I said elsewhere, I will rename
> >> > the testcase for PR67171.
> >> >
> >> > Many thanks for the patch.
> >> >
> >> > Paul
> >> >
> >> > On 23 October 2015 at 09:44, Paul Richard Thomas
> >> > <paul.richard.thomas@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > > Dear Andre,
> >> > >
> >> > > I will wait until you fix the problems that Dominique has pointed out.
> >> > > However, if by Sunday afternoon (rain forecast!) you haven't found the
> >> > > time, I will see if I can locate the source of these new problems.
> >> > >
> >> > > With best regards
> >> > >
> >> > > Paul
> >> > >
> >> > > On 7 October 2015 at 19:51, Dominique d'Humières <dominiq@lps.ens.fr> wrote:
> >> > >> This patch also fixes pr57117 comment 2, the original test and the test in comment 3 now give an ICE
> >> > >>
> >> > >> pr57117.f90:82:0:
> >> > >>
> >> > >>    allocate(z(9), source=reshape(x, (/ 9 /)))
> >> > >> 1
> >> > >> internal compiler error: Segmentation fault: 11
> >> > >>
> >> > >> and pr67044.
> >> > >>
> >> > >> Thanks,
> >> > >>
> >> > >> Dominique
> >> > >>
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > --
> >> > > Outside of a dog, a book is a man's best friend. Inside of a dog it's
> >> > > too dark to read.
> >> > >
> >> > > Groucho Marx
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > Andre Vehreschild * Email: vehre ad gmx dot de
> 
> 
> 


-- 
Andre Vehreschild * Email: vehre ad gmx dot de 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: submit.diff
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 2883 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/attachments/20151026/83c754cd/attachment.bin>