[RFC][PATCH] Preferred rename register in regrename pass
Bernd Schmidt
bschmidt@redhat.com
Fri Oct 9 11:06:00 GMT 2015
Hi Robert,
> gcc/
> * regrename.c (create_new_chain): Initialize terminated_dead,
> renamed and tied_chain.
> (find_best_rename_reg): Pick and check register from the tied chain.
> (regrename_do_replace): Mark head as renamed.
> (scan_rtx_reg): Tie chains in move insns. Set terminate_dead flag.
> * regrename.h (struct du_head): Add tied_chain, renamed and
> terminated_dead members.
Thanks - this looks a lot better already. You didn't say how it was
bootstrapped and tested; please include this information for future
submissions. For a patch like this, some data on the improvement you got
would also be appreciated.
I'd still like to investigate the possibility of further simplification:
> + {
> + /* Find the input chain. */
> + for (i = c->id - 1; id_to_chain.iterate (i, &head); i--)
> + if (head->last && head->last->insn == insn
> + && head->terminated_dead)
> + {
> + gcc_assert (head->regno == REGNO (recog_data.operand[1]));
> + c->tied_chain = head;
> + head->tied_chain = c;
> +
> + if (dump_file)
> + fprintf (dump_file, "Tying chain %s (%d) with %s (%d)\n",
> + reg_names[c->regno], c->id,
> + reg_names[head->regno], head->id);
> + /* Once tied, we're done. */
> + break;
> + }
> + }
> + }
> +
This looks like it's a little more complicated than necessary. Couldn't
you add a static var "terminated_this_insn" which gets initialized to
NULL and set when a reg dies, and then you check this here rather than
having a loop? That would also eliminate the new "terminated_dead" field.
Other than that I'm pretty happy with this.
Bernd
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list