regrename/i386: ROP vs df and stack-regs
Bernd Schmidt
bschmidt@redhat.com
Fri Nov 27 09:36:00 GMT 2015
On 11/27/2015 10:26 AM, Eric Botcazou wrote:
> +#ifdef STACK_REGS
> + if (regstack_completed
> + && REG_P (recog_data.operand[i])
> + && IN_RANGE (REGNO (recog_data.operand[i]),
> + FIRST_STACK_REG, LAST_STACK_REG))
> + untracked_operands |= 1 << i;
> +#endif
>
> Why not use "op" instead of recog_data.operand[i] here? Don't this need to be
> placed before the conditional call to create_new_chain?
Both good points. Ok with those changes (will retest)?
Bernd
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list