regrename/i386: ROP vs df and stack-regs

Bernd Schmidt bschmidt@redhat.com
Fri Nov 27 09:36:00 GMT 2015


On 11/27/2015 10:26 AM, Eric Botcazou wrote:

> +#ifdef STACK_REGS
> +	      if (regstack_completed
> +		  && REG_P (recog_data.operand[i])
> +		  && IN_RANGE (REGNO (recog_data.operand[i]),
> +			       FIRST_STACK_REG, LAST_STACK_REG))
> +		untracked_operands |= 1 << i;
> +#endif
>
> Why not use "op" instead of recog_data.operand[i] here?  Don't this need to be
> placed before the conditional call to create_new_chain?

Both good points. Ok with those changes (will retest)?


Bernd



More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list