[patch] libstdc++/56158 Extend valid values of iostream bitmask types
Martin Sebor
msebor@gmail.com
Thu Nov 12 15:48:00 GMT 2015
On 11/11/2015 02:48 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> As described in the PR, we have operator~ overloads defined for
> enumeration types which produce values outside the range of valid
> values for the type. In C++11 that can be trivially solved by giving
> the enumeration types a fixed underlying type, but this code needs to
> be valid in C++03 too.
>
> This patch defines new min/max enumerators as INT_MIN/INT_MAX so that
> every int value is also a valid value for the bitmask type.
>
> Does anyone see any problems with this solution, or better solutions?
Just a minor nit that the C-style cast in the below triggers
a -Wold-style-cast warning in Clang, in case libstdc++ tries
to be Clang-warning free. Since the type of __INT_MAX__ is
int it shouldn't be necessary.
+ _S_ios_fmtflags_min = ~(int)__INT_MAX__
>
> Any suggestions for how to test this, given that GCC's ubsan doesn't
> check for this, and we can't run the testsuite with ubsan anyway?
Use a case/switch statement with -Werror=switch-enum to make sure
all the cases are handled and none is duplicated or outside of the
valid values of the enumeration:
void foo (ios::iostate s) {
switch (s) {
case badbit:
case eofbit:
case failbit:
case goodbit:
case __INT_MAX__:
case ~__INT_MAX__: ;
}
}
Martin
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list