[PATCH, RFC] fortran [was Re: #pragma GCC unroll support]

[Bernhard Reutner-Fischer]

On May 28, 2015 2:03:08 PM GMT+02:00, Mike Stump <mikestump@comcast.net> wrote:
>On May 28, 2015, at 2:02 AM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
><rep.dot.nop@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Does anybody have a better suggestion?
>> 
>> directive not at the start of a loop at %C
>> directive not followed by a loop at %C
>
>I prefer either of these.  I have a slight preference for the first.

I've changed the Fortran error to the first locally.

>
>> Mike, did you tweak the one or two things you got from the reviews
>> yet?
>
>Nope.
>
>> ISTM your main patch was not OKed yet nor installed.
>
>Been busy with work.  I’ll come back and address the nits that people
>pointed out and see if I can ping it some more and try and get the C++
>bits reviewed.

I take it you're well aware that stage 1 will end in a couple of weeks, and maybe you want to have this in GCC-6, so now would be the perfect time.. :)

Cheers,