[PATCH][RFA] PR rtl-optimization/66237
Mikhail Maltsev
maltsevm@gmail.com
Fri May 22 08:33:00 GMT 2015
This patch fixes a bug introduced by refactoring. A cast from rtx_insn
to rtx_jump_insn in fix_crossing_conditional_branches was placed before
the check, and that caused ICE if the instruction is actually a call,
rather than a jump.
Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64 linux and tested the regressed case
(PR34999) on aarch64 crosscompiler using the provided profiling data.
OK for trunk?
--
Regards,
Mikhail Maltsev
-------------- next part --------------
gcc/ChangeLog:
2015-05-22 Mikhail Maltsev <maltsevm@gmail.com>
PR rtl-optimization/66237
* bb-reorder.c (fix_crossing_conditional_branches): Fix wrong
location of an "as_a" cast.
-------------- next part --------------
diff --git a/gcc/bb-reorder.c b/gcc/bb-reorder.c
index 20e15fc..cbf6343 100644
--- a/gcc/bb-reorder.c
+++ b/gcc/bb-reorder.c
@@ -2044,7 +2044,7 @@ fix_crossing_conditional_branches (void)
if (crossing_edge)
{
- rtx_jump_insn *old_jump = as_a <rtx_jump_insn *> (BB_END (cur_bb));
+ rtx_insn *old_jump = BB_END (cur_bb);
/* Check to make sure the jump instruction is a
conditional jump. */
@@ -2067,6 +2067,9 @@ fix_crossing_conditional_branches (void)
if (set_src && (GET_CODE (set_src) == IF_THEN_ELSE))
{
+ rtx_jump_insn *old_jump_insn =
+ as_a <rtx_jump_insn *> (old_jump);
+
if (GET_CODE (XEXP (set_src, 1)) == PC)
old_label = XEXP (set_src, 2);
else if (GET_CODE (XEXP (set_src, 2)) == PC)
@@ -2095,7 +2098,7 @@ fix_crossing_conditional_branches (void)
emit_label (new_label);
gcc_assert (GET_CODE (old_label) == LABEL_REF);
- old_jump_target = old_jump->jump_target ();
+ old_jump_target = old_jump_insn->jump_target ();
new_jump = as_a <rtx_jump_insn *>
(emit_jump_insn (gen_jump (old_jump_target)));
new_jump->set_jump_target (old_jump_target);
@@ -2114,7 +2117,7 @@ fix_crossing_conditional_branches (void)
/* Make old jump branch to new bb. */
- redirect_jump (old_jump, new_label, 0);
+ redirect_jump (old_jump_insn, new_label, 0);
/* Remove crossing_edge as predecessor of 'dest'. */
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list