[PATCH/libiberty] fix build of gdb/binutils with clang.
Ian Lance Taylor
iant@google.com
Sat May 2 18:58:00 GMT 2015
On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 4:45 PM, Yunlian Jiang <yunlian@google.com> wrote:
> The test case does not have #define _GNU_SOURCE, so it says
> error: ‘asprintf’ undeclared (first use in this function)
OK, then my next question is: why does the test case (I assume you
mean the test case for whether to set HAVE_DECL_ASPRINTF) not have
#define _GNU_SOURCE?
What is the background here?
Ian
> On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 3:45 PM, Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 2:59 PM, Yunlian Jiang <yunlian@google.com> wrote:
>>> I believe this is the same problem as
>>> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-07/msg00292.html
>>>
>>> The asprinf declaration is messed up when using clang to build gdb.
>>>
>>> diff --git a/include/libiberty.h b/include/libiberty.h
>>> index b33dd65..a294903 100644
>>> --- a/include/libiberty.h
>>> +++ b/include/libiberty.h
>>> @@ -625,8 +625,10 @@ extern int pwait (int, int *, int);
>>> /* Like sprintf but provides a pointer to malloc'd storage, which must
>>> be freed by the caller. */
>>>
>>> +#ifndef asprintf
>>> extern int asprintf (char **, const char *, ...) ATTRIBUTE_PRINTF_2;
>>> #endif
>>> +#endif
>>>
>>> /* Like asprintf but allocates memory without fail. This works like
>>> xmalloc. */
>>
>> Why is HAVE_DECL_ASPRINTF not defined?
>>
>> Ian
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list