[PATCH] Document -m{arch,tune}=knl (PR target/65222)

[Uros Bizjak]

On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 8:19 PM, Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> wrote:

> This patch documents knl.  The PR is asking for also documenting
> slm, but I believe those were intentionally removed from the documentation
> as deprecated aliases, at least that is my reading of the
> 2013-12-23   H.J. Lu  <hongjiu.lu@intel.com>
>              Tocar Ilya  <ilya.tocar@intel.com>
> ...
>         * doc/invoke.texi: Replace corei7, corei7-avx, core-avx-i,
>         core-avx2, atom, slm with nehalem, sandybridge, ivybridge,
>         haswell, bonnel, silvermont.  Add westmere.
> change, so I think documenting knl is all we want right now.
> Or should we use knightslanding and make knl an undocumented alias?

H.J., any preferences here? I think that knightslanding is just too
long (and two words), so I'd prefer knl.

> 2015-03-10  Jakub Jelinek  <jakub@redhat.com>
>
>         PR target/65222
>         * doc/invoke.texi: Add knl as x86 -march=/-mtune= CPU type.

Let's wait for HJ, the patch is otherwise OK and safe for mainline.

Thanks,
Uros.