[Bug fortran/52846] [F2008] Support submodules - part 3/3

Paul Richard Thomas paul.richard.thomas@gmail.com
Wed Jul 29 16:45:00 GMT 2015


Dear All,

My reply is the same as FX's. However, I am perfectly happy to
eliminate the initialization. The correct state is ensured by
gfc_dump_module.

Cheers

Paul

On 29 July 2015 at 17:31, FX <fxcoudert@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Why do you initialize a static variable to false?
>
> You mean because false is equal to zero and it will be the default initialization anyway?
> I quite like that the default value is explicit.
>
> FX



-- 
Outside of a dog, a book is a man's best friend. Inside of a dog it's
too dark to read.

Groucho Marx



More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list