[PR64164] drop copyrename, integrate into expand

Alexandre Oliva aoliva@redhat.com
Mon Jul 27 22:16:00 GMT 2015


On Jul 24, 2015, David Edelsohn <dje.gcc@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 4:02 PM, Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@redhat.com> wrote:
>> On Jul 23, 2015, David Edelsohn <dje.gcc@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> I request that this patch be reverted (again).
>> 
>> Might I kindly ask you to please do so for me.  I've just found out
>> that, after yesterday's memory upgrade on my local build machine, the
>> filesystem that I normally use for GCC development got corrupted, and I
>> don't want to mess with it before running an fsck which will take me a
>> while.

> I have reverted the patch.

Thank you very much.  Long story short, the filesystem got corrupted
beyond repair before I realized something was wrong, so I spend my
weekend backing up the bits I still could and recreating it all from
scratch.  *fun* :-/

I even ran memtest before booting up, but everything was fine in the
single-threaded tests it runs by default.  It was only with all cores
actively using memory intensely that something overheated (memory
modules?  chipset?  cpu?  no clue) and started randomly corrupting bits.
So, I'm now back at lower memory clock speeds, and everything appears to
be rock solid again.  Phew!  So, I'm back to debugging the
newly-reported problems and thinking how much further I should extend
testing coverage so that the next round doesn't have to be reverted
again ;-)

Thanks again,

-- 
Alexandre Oliva, freedom fighter    http://FSFLA.org/~lxoliva/
You must be the change you wish to see in the world. -- Gandhi
Be Free! -- http://FSFLA.org/   FSF Latin America board member
Free Software Evangelist|Red Hat Brasil GNU Toolchain Engineer



More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list