[PATCH][AArch64][6/14] Implement TARGET_OPTION_SAVE/TARGET_OPTION_RESTORE
James Greenhalgh
james.greenhalgh@arm.com
Tue Jul 21 11:14:00 GMT 2015
On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 03:19:20PM +0100, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
>
>
> This is a slight respin of this patch, handling the -moverride string more gracefully.
> We need to explicitly save and restore it in TARGET_OPTION_SAVE otherwise the option gen machinery
> gets confused about its type and during its printing uses the wrong format code for the pointer, leading to a warning that may trigger during bootstrap.
>
> Otherwise it is the same as the previous version.
>
> Bootstrapped and tested on aarch64.
> I'd like to propose this version instead of the original.
>
> Ok?
The ChangeLog looks outdated with respect to the patch, in particular:
> (x_aarch64_isa_flags): Likewise.
This is just "aarch64_isa_flags" in the file.
> +TargetSave
> +const char *x_aarch64_override_tune_string
> +
This is not mentioned.
> (master=): Likewise.
This doesn't exist.
> +#undef TARGET_OPTION_SAVE
> +#define TARGET_OPTION_SAVE aarch64_option_save
> +
This is not mentioned.
In addition to the ChangeLog nits,
> +/* Return the CPU corresponding to the enum CPU.
> + If it doesn't specify a cpu, return the default. */
> +
> +static const struct processor *
> +aarch64_get_tune_cpu (enum aarch64_processor cpu)
> +{
> + if (cpu != aarch64_none)
> + return &all_cores[cpu];
> +
> + return &all_cores[TARGET_CPU_DEFAULT & 0x3f];
> +}
This looks strange to me, is there nothing we can do to make it clear
what "0x3f" means in this context, or better yet to get rid of the
two-in-one variable...
OK with a fixed ChangeLog.
Thanks,
James
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list