[doc] fix documentation of -fvtable-verify and related options

[Sandra Loosemore]

On 01/08/2015 10:10 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 01/08/15 15:08, Sandra Loosemore wrote:
>> This patch cleans up the documentation of -fvtable-verify, -fvtv-debug,
>> and -fvtv-counts.  The substantive change is to correct the location of
>> the debug log files per discussion here:
>>
>> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2015-01/msg00029.html
>>
>> but I ended up doing a pretty much total rewrite of the text to fix
>> various markup problems, issues with agreement of verb tense and
>> plurals, usage of terms like "runtime", etc.
>>
>> I think this particular patch goes a little beyond an obvious fix, so I
>> have not committed it yet.  But, I don't want it to get lost in the
>> shuffle, so I propose to do so in a few days if I don't hear any
>> objection or request for more time to review it meanwhile.
>>
>> -Sandra
>>
>>
>> 2015-01-08  Sandra Loosemore  <sandra@codesourcery.com>
>>
>>      gcc/
>>      * doc/invoke.texi ([-fvtable-verify]): Copy-edit and fix markup.
>>      ([-fvtv-debug], [-fvtv-counts]): Likewise.  Correct location
>>      of log files.
>
> This is fine.  I did note that in some places you use "run time" and
> others "run-time".  Not sure if you want those to be consistent or not.
>
> Ok for the trunk.  If you want to make "run time" vs "run-time"
> consistent one way or the other consider it preapproved.

As I noted, the "runtime" vs "run time" vs "run-time" changes are 
deliberate.  See

https://gcc.gnu.org/codingconventions.html#Spelling

I did wonder, though, if "startup" should get the same treatment.... 
but currently "startup" is used consistently throughout the document as 
both noun and adjective, so any change to that ought to be handled 
separately.

-Sandra