[Committed] S/390: Remove -m64/-m31 from target specific testcases
Andreas Krebbel
krebbel@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Fri Feb 27 11:43:00 GMT 2015
Hi,
the attached patch gets rid of -m64/-m31 uses in our target specific
testcases in order to make
"make check RUNTESTFLAGS='--target_board=unix\{-m31,-m64\}'"
runs work fine again.
Committed to mainline.
Bye,
-Andreas-
2015-02-27 Andreas Krebbel <Andreas.Krebbel@de.ibm.com>
* gcc.target/s390/20140327-1.c: Remove -m31 and guard with ! lp64.
* gcc.target/s390/hotpatch-8.c: Likewise.
* gcc.target/s390/hotpatch-9.c: Likewise.
* gcc.target/s390/pr61078.c: Likewise.
* gcc.target/s390/pr57960.c: Remove -m64.
* gcc.target/s390/pr61078.c: Likewise.
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/s390/20140327-1.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/s390/20140327-1.c
index f71c38f..25c7391 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/s390/20140327-1.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/s390/20140327-1.c
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
-/* { dg-do compile } */
-/* { dg-options "-O3 -m31 -mzarch" } */
+/* { dg-do compile { target { ! lp64 } } } */
+/* { dg-options "-O3 -mzarch" } */
void
foo ()
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/s390/hotpatch-8.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/s390/hotpatch-8.c
index 0874bbc..25edd9b 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/s390/hotpatch-8.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/s390/hotpatch-8.c
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
/* Functional tests for the function hotpatching feature. */
-/* { dg-do compile } */
-/* { dg-options "-O3 -mesa -m31 -march=g5 -mhotpatch=0,3" } */
+/* { dg-do compile { target { ! lp64 } } } */
+/* { dg-options "-O3 -mesa -march=g5 -mhotpatch=0,3" } */
#include <stdio.h>
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/s390/hotpatch-9.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/s390/hotpatch-9.c
index d6fb29a..2143f9d 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/s390/hotpatch-9.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/s390/hotpatch-9.c
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
/* Functional tests for the function hotpatching feature. */
-/* { dg-do compile } */
-/* { dg-options "-O3 -mesa -m31 -march=g5 -mhotpatch=0,4" } */
+/* { dg-do compile { target { ! lp64 } } } */
+/* { dg-options "-O3 -mesa -march=g5 -mhotpatch=0,4" } */
#include <stdio.h>
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/s390/pr57559.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/s390/pr57559.c
index 15c3878..1c62f56 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/s390/pr57559.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/s390/pr57559.c
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
/* PR rtl-optimization/57559 */
/* { dg-do compile } */
-/* { dg-options "-march=z10 -m64 -mzarch -O1" } */
+/* { dg-options "-march=z10 -mzarch -O1" } */
typedef int int32_t;
typedef unsigned char uint8_t;
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/s390/pr57960.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/s390/pr57960.c
index ee751ed..03578ff 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/s390/pr57960.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/s390/pr57960.c
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
/* PR rtl-optimization/57960 */
/* { dg-do compile } */
-/* { dg-options "-march=z10 -m64 -mzarch -O1" } */
+/* { dg-options "-march=z10 -mzarch -O1" } */
typedef union
{
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/s390/pr61078.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/s390/pr61078.c
index 2f95eba..40f6ad7 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/s390/pr61078.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/s390/pr61078.c
@@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
/* This testcase is extracted from s390_emit_prologue. The negation
of a 64bit value got split incorrectly on 31 bit. */
-/* { dg-do run } */
-/* { dg-options "-O2 -mesa -m31" } */
+/* { dg-do run { target { ! lp64 } } } */
+/* { dg-options "-O2 -mesa" } */
extern void abort (void);
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list