[PATCH] Fix PR68559
Richard Biener
rguenther@suse.de
Wed Dec 2 13:31:00 GMT 2015
On Wed, 2 Dec 2015, Alan Lawrence wrote:
> On 27/11/15 14:13, Richard Biener wrote:
> >
> > The following fixes the excessive peeling for gaps we do when doing
> > SLP now that I removed most of the restrictions on having gaps in
> > the first place.
> >
> > This should make low-trip vectorized loops more efficient (sth
> > also the combine-epilogue-with-vectorized-body-by-masking patches
> > claim to do).
> >
> > Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, applied to trunk.
> >
> > Richard.
> >
> > 2015-11-27 Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
> >
> > PR tree-optimization/68559
> > * tree-vect-data-refs.c (vect_analyze_group_access_1): Move
> > peeling for gap checks ...
> > * tree-vect-stmts.c (vectorizable_load): ... here and relax
> > for SLP.
> > * tree-vect-loop.c (vect_analyze_loop_2): Re-set
> > LOOP_VINFO_PEELING_FOR_GAPS before re-trying without SLP.
> >
> > * gcc.dg/vect/slp-perm-4.c: Adjust again.
> > * gcc.dg/vect/pr45752.c: Likewise.
>
> Since this, we have
>
> FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/pr45752.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects scan-tree-dump-times vect
> "gaps requires scalar epilogue loop" 0
> FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/pr45752.c scan-tree-dump-times vect "gaps requires scalar
> epilogue loop" 0
>
> on aarch64 platforms (aarch64-none-linux-gnu, aarch64-none-elf,
> aarch64_be-none-elf).
Can you open a bug and attach -details vectorizer dumps?
Richard.
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list