[RFC: Patch, PR 60158] gcc/varasm.c : Pass actual alignment value to output_constant_pool_2

[rohitarulraj@freescale.com]

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Jeff Law [mailto:law@redhat.com] 
>Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2015 11:48 PM
>To: Dharmakan Rohit-B30502; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; rguenther@suse.de; Jakub Jelinek
>Cc: Alan Modra; David Edelsohn; Wienskoski Edmar-RA8797
>Subject: Re: [RFC: Patch, PR 60158] gcc/varasm.c : Pass actual alignment value to output_constant_pool_2
>
>On 04/28/2015 03:44 AM, rohitarulraj@freescale.com wrote:
>> Ping.
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Dharmakan Rohit-B30502
>> Sent: Friday, March 27, 2015 7:57 PM
>> To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; rguenther@suse.de; Jakub Jelinek
>> Cc: Alan Modra; David Edelsohn; Wienskoski Edmar-RA8797; Dharmakan Rohit-B30502
> >Subject: RE: [RFC: Patch, PR 60158] gcc/varasm.c : Pass actual alignment value to output_constant_pool_2
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I would like to resubmit these patches for comments. The previous detailed discussion is available in the below mentioned link.
>> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-04/msg01679.html
>> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-05/msg00489.html
>>
>> The issue is still reproducible on GCC v4.8 branch.
>>
>> I have tested both the attached patches with e500v2 tool chain on GCC v4.8 branch [rev 221667] and GCC trunk [rev 221310] with no regressions.
>>
>> Patch1 [gcc.fix_pr60158_fixup_table_fsf_1]: Pass actual alignment value to output_constant_pool_2.
>> Patch2 [gcc.fix_pr60158_fixup_table_fsf_2]: Use the alignment data available in the first argument (constant_descriptor_rtx) of output_constant_pool_1.
>>          (Note: this generates ".align" directive twice).
>Are you asking for both patches to be applied or just one?
Just one, needed your comments on which would be better.

Regards,
Rohit