__intN patch 3/5: main __int128 -> __intN conversion.

DJ Delorie dj@redhat.com
Mon Sep 29 18:06:00 GMT 2014


> Just one question about the include/std/limits changes below.
> 
> It seems that __glibcxx_signed_b isn't strictly necessary as it
> doesn't use the B argument, so is it just there for consistency?

Yup.



More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list