[PATCH] PR63300 'const volatile' sometimes stripped in debug info.

Mark Wielaard mjw@redhat.com
Thu Sep 25 15:23:00 GMT 2014

On Wed, 2014-09-24 at 17:09 -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 09/24/2014 02:42 PM, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> > As my example shows even with older GCCs depending on whether a const
> > type or volatile type was encountered first a const volatile type comes
> > out either as a DIE chain const_type DIE -> volatile_type DIE -> type
> > DIE, or the other way around, in different compile units.
> Sorry, I overlooked that you were talking about 4.8.3 in your earlier mail.
> The patch is OK.


I did post to the DWARF mailinglist to ask for clarification of the
issue of ordering of type qualifier modifiers vs type unit signatures:



More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list