Updated no_reorder patchkit

[Jan Hubicka]

> This version addresses earlier comments and has an updated testsuite
> (still no LTO tests however). The assembler statements also
> no stay in order with ordered statements.
> 
> It doesn't disable sorting of paritions with ordered symbols. I think
> that's an existing bug and is best addressed separately.

Yep, we actually should output two orders - one for Makefile priorities (sorted
by size) and one for final link command.  That would solve the problem.

Honza
> 
> Passed LTO boot strap and test on x86_64-linux, plus build
> of a large project that needs LTO order.
> 
> -Andi