[PATCH] gcc parallel make check

Jason Merrill jason@redhat.com
Mon Sep 22 15:43:00 GMT 2014


On 09/22/2014 11:26 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 11:21:14AM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
>> If I say 'rgt dg.exp=var-templ1.C' the actual test results are lost in the
>> explosion of shell verbosity.  Could we add some '@'s to more of the rules,
>> perhaps?
>
> I've been considering that too, but not sure what info people find valuable
> and what they don't.

I don't see much information in the ~128 repetitions of the 
check-parallel rules with different numbers; the actual runtest command 
is the same in all of them.  Adding @ to all of the commands of the 
check-parallel-% rule makes things much better for me:

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: check-parallel.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 813 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/attachments/20140922/0a2a73d4/attachment.bin>


More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list