[PATCH] gcc parallel make check

Jakub Jelinek jakub@redhat.com
Mon Sep 22 15:26:00 GMT 2014


On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 11:21:14AM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 09/12/2014 08:04 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> >I've been worried about the quick cases where
> >parallelization is not beneficial, like make check-gcc \
> >RUNTESTFLAGS=dg.exp=pr60123.c or similar, but one doesn't usually pass -jN
> >in that case.
> 
> I have -jN in my $MAKEFLAGS, so I've been running into this with my rgt
> shell function:
> 
> rgt ()
> {
>     ( cd ~/m/$CANON/gcc/gcc;
>     make check-c++ ${1:+RUNTESTFLAGS="$*"} )
> }
> 
> If I say 'rgt dg.exp=var-templ1.C' the actual test results are lost in the
> explosion of shell verbosity.  Could we add some '@'s to more of the rules,
> perhaps?

I've been considering that too, but not sure what info people find valuable
and what they don't.

	Jakub



More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list