[PATCH] gcc parallel make check

Jason Merrill jason@redhat.com
Mon Sep 22 15:21:00 GMT 2014


On 09/12/2014 08:04 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> I've been worried about the quick cases where
> parallelization is not beneficial, like make check-gcc \
> RUNTESTFLAGS=dg.exp=pr60123.c or similar, but one doesn't usually pass -jN
> in that case.

I have -jN in my $MAKEFLAGS, so I've been running into this with my rgt 
shell function:

rgt ()
{
     ( cd ~/m/$CANON/gcc/gcc;
     make check-c++ ${1:+RUNTESTFLAGS="$*"} )
}

If I say 'rgt dg.exp=var-templ1.C' the actual test results are lost in 
the explosion of shell verbosity.  Could we add some '@'s to more of the 
rules, perhaps?

Jason



More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list