[C PATCH] Better diagnostics for C++ comments in C90 (PR c/61854)

Marek Polacek polacek@redhat.com
Wed Sep 17 19:14:00 GMT 2014


On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 10:32:51PM +0000, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> This is getting closer, but it looks like you still treat it as a line 
> comment when being skipped for C90, when actually it's not safe to treat 
> it like that; you have to produce a '/' preprocessing token and continue 
> tokenizing the rest of the line.  Consider the following code:
> 
> int i = 0
> #if 0
> // /*
> #else
> // */
> +1
> #endif
> ;
> 
> For C90 i gets value 0.  With // comments it gets value 1.

Aha.  I made a thinko, hopefully fixed now.  I added two new tests
(it's definitely good to have more testing in this area!) based on
your code, thanks for that.
 
> > +	  /* In C89/C94, C++ style comments are forbidden.  */
> > +	  else if ((CPP_OPTION (pfile, lang) == CLK_STDC89
> > +		    || CPP_OPTION (pfile, lang) == CLK_STDC94))
> > +	    {
> > +	      /* But don't be confused about // immediately followed by *.  */
> > +	      if (buffer->cur[1] == '*'
> > +		  || pfile->state.in_directive)
> 
> And this comment needs updating to reflect that it's not just //* where // 
> can appear in valid C90 code in a way incompatible with treating it as a 
> comment.

Sure, updated.

Bootstrap in progress, regtested on x86_64-linux, ok for trunk?

2014-09-17  Marek Polacek  <polacek@redhat.com>

	PR c/61854
libcpp/
	* init.c (struct lang_flags): Remove cplusplus_comments.
	(cpp_set_lang): Likewise.
	(post_options): Likewise.
	* lex.c (_cpp_lex_direct): Disallow C++ style comments in C90/C94.
testsuite/
	* gcc.dg/cpp/pr61854-1.c: New test.
	* gcc.dg/cpp/pr61854-2.c: New test.
	* gcc.dg/cpp/pr61854-3.c: New test.
	* gcc.dg/cpp/pr61854-3.h: New test.
	* gcc.dg/cpp/pr61854-4.c: New test.
	* gcc.dg/cpp/pr61854-5.c: New test.
	* gcc.dg/cpp/pr61854-6.c: New test.
	* gcc.dg/cpp/pr61854-7.c: New test.
	* gcc.dg/cpp/pr61854-c90.c: New test.
	* gcc.dg/cpp/pr61854-c94.c: New test.

diff --git gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/cpp/pr61854-1.c gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/cpp/pr61854-1.c
index e69de29..364a511 100644
--- gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/cpp/pr61854-1.c
+++ gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/cpp/pr61854-1.c
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+/* PR c/61854 */
+/* { dg-do run } */
+/* { dg-options "-std=c89" } */
+
+int
+main (void)
+{
+  int i = 1 //**/ 2
+  ;
+  int j = 1 //**/ 2
+  ;
+  if (i != 0 || j != 0)
+    __builtin_abort ();  
+  return 0;
+}
diff --git gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/cpp/pr61854-2.c gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/cpp/pr61854-2.c
index e69de29..883db21 100644
--- gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/cpp/pr61854-2.c
+++ gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/cpp/pr61854-2.c
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+/* PR c/61854 */
+/* { dg-do run } */
+/* { dg-options "-std=gnu89" } */
+
+int
+main (void)
+{
+  int i = 1 //**/ 2
+  ;
+  int j = 1 //**/ 2
+  ;
+  if (i != 1 || j != 1)
+    __builtin_abort ();  
+  return 0;
+}
diff --git gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/cpp/pr61854-3.c gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/cpp/pr61854-3.c
index e69de29..916c12e 100644
--- gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/cpp/pr61854-3.c
+++ gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/cpp/pr61854-3.c
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+/* PR c/61854 */
+/* { dg-do preprocess } */
+/* { dg-options "-std=c89" } */
+
+#include "pr61854-3.h"
+int i;
diff --git gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/cpp/pr61854-3.h gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/cpp/pr61854-3.h
index e69de29..fd798bd 100644
--- gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/cpp/pr61854-3.h
+++ gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/cpp/pr61854-3.h
@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
+#pragma GCC system_header
+// X
+// Y
+// Z
diff --git gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/cpp/pr61854-4.c gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/cpp/pr61854-4.c
index e69de29..5cfa5a7 100644
--- gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/cpp/pr61854-4.c
+++ gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/cpp/pr61854-4.c
@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+/* PR c/61854 */
+/* { dg-do preprocess } */
+/* { dg-options "-std=c89" } */
+
+void
+foo (void)
+{
+#if 0
+  // Do not error here.
+#endif
+#if 1
+  // But error here.
+#endif
+  /* { dg-error "C\\+\\+ style comments are not allowed in ISO C90" "comments"  { target *-*-*} 12 } */
+  /* { dg-error "reported only once" ""  { target *-*-*} 12 } */
+}
diff --git gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/cpp/pr61854-5.c gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/cpp/pr61854-5.c
index e69de29..a7628dc 100644
--- gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/cpp/pr61854-5.c
+++ gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/cpp/pr61854-5.c
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+/* PR c/61854 */
+/* { dg-do run } */
+/* { dg-options "-std=c89" } */
+
+#define h(x) #x
+#define s(x) h(x)
+#define foo //
+
+int
+main (void)
+{
+  if (__builtin_memcmp (s(foo), "//", 3) != 0)
+    __builtin_abort ();
+  return 0;
+}
diff --git gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/cpp/pr61854-6.c gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/cpp/pr61854-6.c
index e69de29..1b60cc3 100644
--- gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/cpp/pr61854-6.c
+++ gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/cpp/pr61854-6.c
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+/* PR c/61854 */
+/* { dg-do run } */
+/* { dg-options "-std=gnu89" } */
+
+int
+main (void)
+{
+  int i = 0
+#if 0
+// /*
+#else
+// */
++1
+#endif
+;
+  if (i != 1)
+    __builtin_abort ();
+  return 0;
+}
diff --git gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/cpp/pr61854-7.c gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/cpp/pr61854-7.c
index e69de29..8bf479b 100644
--- gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/cpp/pr61854-7.c
+++ gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/cpp/pr61854-7.c
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+/* PR c/61854 */
+/* { dg-do run } */
+/* { dg-options "-std=c89" } */
+
+int
+main (void)
+{
+  int i = 0
+#if 0
+// /*
+#else
+// */
++1
+#endif
+;
+  if (i != 0)
+    __builtin_abort ();
+  return 0;
+}
diff --git gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/cpp/pr61854-c90.c gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/cpp/pr61854-c90.c
index e69de29..37eecbe 100644
--- gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/cpp/pr61854-c90.c
+++ gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/cpp/pr61854-c90.c
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+/* PR c/61854 */
+/* { dg-do preprocess } */
+/* { dg-options "-std=iso9899:1990" } */
+
+void
+foo (void)
+{
+  // 1st
+  /* { dg-error "C\\+\\+ style comments are not allowed in ISO C90" "comments"  { target *-*-*} 8 } */
+  /* { dg-error "reported only once" ""  { target *-*-*} 8 } */
+  // 2nd
+  // 3rd
+}
diff --git gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/cpp/pr61854-c94.c gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/cpp/pr61854-c94.c
index e69de29..64f1e18 100644
--- gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/cpp/pr61854-c94.c
+++ gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/cpp/pr61854-c94.c
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+/* PR c/61854 */
+/* { dg-do preprocess } */
+/* { dg-options "-std=iso9899:199409" } */
+
+void
+foo (void)
+{
+  // 1st
+  /* { dg-error "C\\+\\+ style comments are not allowed in ISO C90" "comments"  { target *-*-*} 8 } */
+  /* { dg-error "reported only once" ""  { target *-*-*} 8 } */
+  // 2nd
+  // 3rd
+}
diff --git gcc/libcpp/init.c gcc/libcpp/init.c
index d612374..1121962 100644
--- gcc/libcpp/init.c
+++ gcc/libcpp/init.c
@@ -83,7 +83,6 @@ struct lang_flags
   char extended_identifiers;
   char c11_identifiers;
   char std;
-  char cplusplus_comments;
   char digraphs;
   char uliterals;
   char rliterals;
@@ -94,23 +93,23 @@ struct lang_flags
 };
 
 static const struct lang_flags lang_defaults[] =
-{ /*              c99 c++ xnum xid c11 std // digr ulit rlit udlit bincst digsep trig */
-  /* GNUC89   */  { 0,  0,  1,  0,  0,  0,  1,  1,  0,   0,   0,    0,     0,     0 },
-  /* GNUC99   */  { 1,  0,  1,  0,  0,  0,  1,  1,  1,   1,   0,    0,     0,     0 },
-  /* GNUC11   */  { 1,  0,  1,  0,  1,  0,  1,  1,  1,   1,   0,    0,     0,     0 },
-  /* STDC89   */  { 0,  0,  0,  0,  0,  1,  0,  0,  0,   0,   0,    0,     0,     1 },
-  /* STDC94   */  { 0,  0,  0,  0,  0,  1,  0,  1,  0,   0,   0,    0,     0,     1 },
-  /* STDC99   */  { 1,  0,  1,  0,  0,  1,  1,  1,  0,   0,   0,    0,     0,     1 },
-  /* STDC11   */  { 1,  0,  1,  0,  1,  1,  1,  1,  1,   0,   0,    0,     0,     1 },
-  /* GNUCXX   */  { 0,  1,  1,  0,  0,  0,  1,  1,  0,   0,   0,    0,     0,     0 },
-  /* CXX98    */  { 0,  1,  0,  0,  0,  1,  1,  1,  0,   0,   0,    0,     0,     1 },
-  /* GNUCXX11 */  { 1,  1,  1,  0,  1,  0,  1,  1,  1,   1,   1,    0,     0,     0 },
-  /* CXX11    */  { 1,  1,  1,  0,  1,  1,  1,  1,  1,   1,   1,    0,     0,     1 },
-  /* GNUCXX14 */  { 1,  1,  1,  0,  1,  0,  1,  1,  1,   1,   1,    1,     1,     0 },
-  /* CXX14    */  { 1,  1,  1,  0,  1,  1,  1,  1,  1,   1,   1,    1,     1,     1 },
-  /* GNUCXX1Z */  { 1,  1,  1,  0,  1,  0,  1,  1,  1,   1,   1,    1,     1,     0 },
-  /* CXX1Z    */  { 1,  1,  1,  0,  1,  1,  1,  1,  1,   1,   1,    1,     1,     0 },
-  /* ASM      */  { 0,  0,  1,  0,  0,  0,  1,  0,  0,   0,   0,    0,     0,     0 }
+{ /*              c99 c++ xnum xid c11 std digr ulit rlit udlit bincst digsep trig */
+  /* GNUC89   */  { 0,  0,  1,  0,  0,  0,  1,   0,   0,   0,    0,     0,     0 },
+  /* GNUC99   */  { 1,  0,  1,  0,  0,  0,  1,   1,   1,   0,    0,     0,     0 },
+  /* GNUC11   */  { 1,  0,  1,  0,  1,  0,  1,   1,   1,   0,    0,     0,     0 },
+  /* STDC89   */  { 0,  0,  0,  0,  0,  1,  0,   0,   0,   0,    0,     0,     1 },
+  /* STDC94   */  { 0,  0,  0,  0,  0,  1,  1,   0,   0,   0,    0,     0,     1 },
+  /* STDC99   */  { 1,  0,  1,  0,  0,  1,  1,   0,   0,   0,    0,     0,     1 },
+  /* STDC11   */  { 1,  0,  1,  0,  1,  1,  1,   1,   0,   0,    0,     0,     1 },
+  /* GNUCXX   */  { 0,  1,  1,  0,  0,  0,  1,   0,   0,   0,    0,     0,     0 },
+  /* CXX98    */  { 0,  1,  0,  0,  0,  1,  1,   0,   0,   0,    0,     0,     1 },
+  /* GNUCXX11 */  { 1,  1,  1,  0,  1,  0,  1,   1,   1,   1,    0,     0,     0 },
+  /* CXX11    */  { 1,  1,  1,  0,  1,  1,  1,   1,   1,   1,    0,     0,     1 },
+  /* GNUCXX14 */  { 1,  1,  1,  0,  1,  0,  1,   1,   1,   1,    1,     1,     0 },
+  /* CXX14    */  { 1,  1,  1,  0,  1,  1,  1,   1,   1,   1,    1,     1,     1 },
+  /* GNUCXX1Z */  { 1,  1,  1,  0,  1,  0,  1,   1,   1,   1,    1,     1,     0 },
+  /* CXX1Z    */  { 1,  1,  1,  0,  1,  1,  1,   1,   1,   1,    1,     1,     0 },
+  /* ASM      */  { 0,  0,  1,  0,  0,  0,  0,   0,   0,   0,    0,     0,     0 }
   /* xid should be 1 for GNUC99, STDC99, GNUCXX, CXX98, GNUCXX11, CXX11,
      GNUCXX14, and CXX14 when no longer experimental (when all uses of
      identifiers in the compiler have been audited for correct handling
@@ -131,7 +130,6 @@ cpp_set_lang (cpp_reader *pfile, enum c_lang lang)
   CPP_OPTION (pfile, extended_identifiers)	 = l->extended_identifiers;
   CPP_OPTION (pfile, c11_identifiers)		 = l->c11_identifiers;
   CPP_OPTION (pfile, std)			 = l->std;
-  CPP_OPTION (pfile, cplusplus_comments)	 = l->cplusplus_comments;
   CPP_OPTION (pfile, digraphs)			 = l->digraphs;
   CPP_OPTION (pfile, uliterals)			 = l->uliterals;
   CPP_OPTION (pfile, rliterals)			 = l->rliterals;
@@ -775,8 +773,6 @@ post_options (cpp_reader *pfile)
 
   if (CPP_OPTION (pfile, traditional))
     {
-      CPP_OPTION (pfile, cplusplus_comments) = 0;
-
       CPP_OPTION (pfile, trigraphs) = 0;
       CPP_OPTION (pfile, warn_trigraphs) = 0;
     }
diff --git gcc/libcpp/lex.c gcc/libcpp/lex.c
index 5366dad..8f75851 100644
--- gcc/libcpp/lex.c
+++ gcc/libcpp/lex.c
@@ -2322,13 +2322,16 @@ _cpp_lex_direct (cpp_reader *pfile)
 	  if (_cpp_skip_block_comment (pfile))
 	    cpp_error (pfile, CPP_DL_ERROR, "unterminated comment");
 	}
-      else if (c == '/' && (CPP_OPTION (pfile, cplusplus_comments)
-			    || cpp_in_system_header (pfile)))
+      else if (c == '/' && ! CPP_OPTION (pfile, traditional))
 	{
+	  /* Don't warn for system headers.  */
+	  if (cpp_in_system_header (pfile))
+	    ;
 	  /* Warn about comments if pedantically GNUC89, and not
 	     in system headers.  */
-	  if (CPP_OPTION (pfile, lang) == CLK_GNUC89 && CPP_PEDANTIC (pfile)
-	      && ! buffer->warned_cplusplus_comments)
+	  else if (CPP_OPTION (pfile, lang) == CLK_GNUC89
+		   && CPP_PEDANTIC (pfile)
+		   && ! buffer->warned_cplusplus_comments)
 	    {
 	      cpp_error (pfile, CPP_DL_PEDWARN,
 			 "C++ style comments are not allowed in ISO C90");
@@ -2347,7 +2350,31 @@ _cpp_lex_direct (cpp_reader *pfile)
 			 "(this will be reported only once per input file)");
 	      buffer->warned_cplusplus_comments = 1;
 	    }
-
+	  /* In C89/C94, C++ style comments are forbidden.  */
+	  else if ((CPP_OPTION (pfile, lang) == CLK_STDC89
+		    || CPP_OPTION (pfile, lang) == CLK_STDC94))
+	    {
+	      /* But don't be confused about valid code such as
+	         - // immediately followed by *,
+		 - // in a preprocessing directive,
+		 - // in an #if 0 block.  */
+	      if (buffer->cur[1] == '*'
+		  || pfile->state.in_directive
+		  || pfile->state.skipping)
+		{
+		  result->type = CPP_DIV;
+		  break;
+		}
+	      else if (! buffer->warned_cplusplus_comments)
+		{
+		  cpp_error (pfile, CPP_DL_ERROR,
+			     "C++ style comments are not allowed in ISO C90");
+		  cpp_error (pfile, CPP_DL_ERROR,
+			     "(this will be reported only once per input "
+			     "file)");
+		  buffer->warned_cplusplus_comments = 1;
+		}
+	    }
 	  if (skip_line_comment (pfile) && CPP_OPTION (pfile, warn_comments))
 	    cpp_warning (pfile, CPP_W_COMMENTS, "multi-line comment");
 	}

	Marek



More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list