[C++ Patch] PR 62232

[Paolo Carlini]

Hi,

clang recently, in 3.5.0 if I remember correctly, stopped 
-Wnon-virtual-dtor warning for final classes. I think it makes sense to 
do the same.

Tested x86_64-linux.

Thanks,
Paolo.

////////////////////7
-------------- next part --------------
/cp
2014-09-17  Paolo Carlini  <paolo.carlini@oracle.com>

	PR c++/62232
	* class.c (finish_struct_1): Do not -Wnon-virtual-dtor warn
	for final class types.

/testsuite
2014-09-17  Paolo Carlini  <paolo.carlini@oracle.com>

	PR c++/62232
	* g++.dg/cpp0x/Wdtor1.C: New.
-------------- next part --------------
Index: cp/class.c
===================================================================
--- cp/class.c	(revision 215325)
+++ cp/class.c	(working copy)
@@ -6506,7 +6506,8 @@ finish_struct_1 (tree t)
   /* This warning does not make sense for Java classes, since they
      cannot have destructors.  */
   if (!TYPE_FOR_JAVA (t) && warn_nonvdtor
-      && TYPE_POLYMORPHIC_P (t) && accessible_nvdtor_p (t))
+      && TYPE_POLYMORPHIC_P (t) && accessible_nvdtor_p (t)
+      && !CLASSTYPE_FINAL (t))
     warning (OPT_Wnon_virtual_dtor,
 	     "%q#T has virtual functions and accessible"
 	     " non-virtual destructor", t);
Index: testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/Wdtor1.C
===================================================================
--- testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/Wdtor1.C	(revision 0)
+++ testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/Wdtor1.C	(working copy)
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+// PR c++/62232
+// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } }
+// { dg-options "-Wnon-virtual-dtor" }
+
+class base
+{
+protected:
+  ~base () {}
+  virtual void foo (){};
+};
+class derive final : public base
+{
+};