[patch i386]: Sibcall tail-call improvement and partial fix PR/60104

FX fxcoudert@gmail.com
Mon Sep 15 11:30:00 GMT 2014

> Perhaps it would be safer simply to revert that hunk of the original patch unless/until (1) and (2) above are addressed?

Given that the original patch addresses “only” a missed-optimization (and causes ice-on-valid), it makes sense to me.


More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list