DBL_DENORM_MIN should never be 0

Joseph S. Myers joseph@codesourcery.com
Thu Sep 11 20:28:00 GMT 2014


On Thu, 11 Sep 2014, Marc Glisse wrote:

> On Thu, 11 Sep 2014, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, 11 Sep 2014, Marc Glisse wrote:
> > 
> > > I don't know what kind of test you have in mind, so I added a runtime
> > > test. I
> > > am just guessing that it probably fails on alpha because of PR 58757, I
> > > can't
> > > test. Computing d+d may be even more likely to trigger potential issues,
> > > if
> > > that's the goal.
> > 
> > Yes, a runtime test.  I don't think there should be an xfail without it
> > actually having been tested to fail (and then such an xfail should come
> > with a comment referencing the bug filed in Bugzilla).
> 
> Would it be ok with the attached testcase then? (same ChangeLog).

Yes, OK with that test.

-- 
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com



More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list