[PATCH][AArch64 Testsuite] Add test of vld[234]q? intrinsic

[Christophe Lyon]

Ha OK, I had misunderstood your first email, and thought you had the
test also pass in big endian.

Thanks for the clarification.


On 11 September 2014 15:56, Alan Lawrence <alan.lawrence@arm.com> wrote:
> Yes, I had seen that, and the failure is expected. AFAICT the test is
> correct; but the implementation of vld[234] is incorrect on bigendian,
> because of https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59810 .
>
> HTH, Alan.
>
>
>
>
> Christophe Lyon wrote:
>>
>> On 9 September 2014 12:19, Marcus Shawcroft <marcus.shawcroft@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 8 September 2014 11:35, Alan Lawrence <alan.lawrence@arm.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> This adds a test of all the variants of vld2, vld2q, vld3, vld3q, vld4,
>>>> and
>>>> vld4q. These all use typexNxM structs and the OI/CI/XImode mechanism, so
>>>> the
>>>> test cross-checks this against plain ol' vst1(q?).
>>>>
>>>> Cross-tested on aarch64-none-elf (passing), also on aarch64_be-none-elf
>>>> (https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59810).
>>>>
>>
>> Hi Alan,
>>
>> On my side, your new test fails at execution on aarch64_be-none-elf:
>>
>> http://cbuild.validation.linaro.org/build/cross-validation/gcc/trunk/215072/report-build-info.html
>>
>> This seems strange since you tested it too.
>> I am using the Foundation Model.
>>
>> Christophe.
>>
>>>> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>>>>
>>>>         * gcc.target/aarch64/vldN_1.c: New test.
>>>
>>> OK /Marcus
>>
>>
>
>