[Patch ARM v2] Fix PR target/56846

Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana.radhakrishnan@arm.com
Wed Sep 10 16:17:00 GMT 2014

On 10/09/14 15:38, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 10/09/14 15:41 +0800, Tony Wang wrote:
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Jonathan Wakely [mailto:jwakely@redhat.com]
>>> Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2014 6:40 PM
>>> To: Tony Wang
>>> Cc: Ramana Radhakrishnan; gcc-patches; libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org
>>> Subject: Re: [Patch ARM v2] Fix PR target/56846
>>> On 09/09/14 17:47 +0800, Tony Wang wrote:
>>>> Hi there,
>>>> This is a updated patch to fix pr56846. Bootstrapped on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu and no regression for
>>>> regression test on Linux and a cross regression test on arm-none-eabi.
>>>> OK for the trunk?
>>>> gcc/libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
>>>> 2014-09-09   Tony Wang <tony.wang@arm.com>
>>>>                  PR target/56846
>>>>                  * libsupc++/eh_personality.cc(PERSONALITY_FUNCTION):
>>>                                                 ^
>>> There should be a space after the file name (look at existing
>>> changelog entries)
>>> OK with that change.
>> Committed with your comment on trunk, and also tested on 4.9 branch with no regression. So is it ok to back
>> port to 4.9 branch?
> I'd at least like to see it working OK on trunk for a while without
> regressions, and I don't know the EABI code well enough to be
> confident it's safe to backport.

I am reasonably sure it's ok from my reading of the explanation and the 
code considered, and I'd also to some extent take Andrew's word for it 
since he's been involved in this space.

I'd like it to bake on trunk for a few days before we ask for this to be 
backported. It would give all autotesters that run for ARM a chance to 
catch up and make sure we aren't missing anything.

 From my p.o.v. this is an RM decision.


More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list