[PATCH] RE: gcc parallel make check
Tue Sep 9 14:46:00 GMT 2014
On 09/09/2014 06:33 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 09, 2014 at 06:27:10PM +0400, Yury Gribov wrote:
>> On 09/09/2014 06:14 PM, VandeVondele Joost wrote:
>>> I certainly don't want to claim that the patch I have now is perfect,
>>> it is rather an incremental improvement on the current setup.
>> I'd second this. Writing patterns manually seems rather inefficient and
>> (not undoable of course but unnecessarily complicated). And with current
>> version Joost already got 100% test time improvement.
> But if there are jobs that just take 1s to complete, then clearly it doesn't
> make sense to split them off as separate job. I think we don't need 100%
> even split, but at least roughly is highly desirable.
You mean enhancing the script to split across arbitrarily long prefixes?
That would be great.
More information about the Gcc-patches