[PATCH] RE: gcc parallel make check

[Jakub Jelinek]

On Tue, Sep 09, 2014 at 06:27:10PM +0400, Yury Gribov wrote:
> On 09/09/2014 06:14 PM, VandeVondele Joost wrote:
> >I certainly don't want to claim that the patch I have now is perfect,
> >it is rather an incremental improvement on the current setup.
> 
> I'd second this. Writing patterns manually seems rather inefficient and
> error-prone
> (not undoable of course but unnecessarily complicated). And with current
> (crippled)
> version Joost already got 100% test time improvement.

But if there are jobs that just take 1s to complete, then clearly it doesn't
make sense to split them off as separate job.  I think we don't need 100%
even split, but at least roughly is highly desirable.

	Jakub