[PATCH, C++] Fix PR63366: __complex not equivalent to __complex double in C++

[Thomas Preud'homme]

> From: Nathan Sidwell [mailto:nathanmsidwell@gmail.com] On Behalf Of
> Nathan Sidwell
> 
> It's not an error to omit it for complex - but of course means something
> different.  IMHO it would be confusing to set type to integer_type_node
> when
> that's definitely wrong.  But then setting 'defaulted_int'  when that's not
> the
> case is also confusing.

Oh in that case the patch is incomplete. Currently a complex alone gives
an error at compilation which is why I added -fpermissive to the testcase.
The patch don't change this behavior.

Best regards,

Thomas