[pr/63582] Don't even store __int128 types if not supported.
DJ Delorie
dj@redhat.com
Sat Oct 25 06:29:00 GMT 2014
Fixed PR/63582. Tested with no regressions on x86-64 and ix86. Ok?
* tree.c (build_common_tree_nodes): Don't even store the
__int128 types if they're not supported.
Index: tree.c
===================================================================
--- tree.c (revision 216676)
+++ tree.c (working copy)
@@ -9623,13 +9623,14 @@ build_common_tree_nodes (bool signed_cha
{
int_n_trees[i].signed_type = make_signed_type (int_n_data[i].bitsize);
int_n_trees[i].unsigned_type = make_unsigned_type (int_n_data[i].bitsize);
TYPE_SIZE (int_n_trees[i].signed_type) = bitsize_int (int_n_data[i].bitsize);
TYPE_SIZE (int_n_trees[i].unsigned_type) = bitsize_int (int_n_data[i].bitsize);
- if (int_n_data[i].bitsize > LONG_LONG_TYPE_SIZE)
+ if (int_n_data[i].bitsize > LONG_LONG_TYPE_SIZE
+ && int_n_enabled_p[i])
{
integer_types[itk_intN_0 + i * 2] = int_n_trees[i].signed_type;
integer_types[itk_unsigned_intN_0 + i * 2] = int_n_trees[i].unsigned_type;
}
}
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list