The nvptx port [11/11] More tools.

[Bernd Schmidt]

On 10/22/2014 10:31 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
>> These tools currently require GNU extensions - something I probably
>> ought to fix if we decide to add them to the gcc build itself.
> Would these be more appropriate in binutils?

I don't think so, given that we don't need any piece of regular 
binutils. There's no meaningful way to build libbfd. It would be strange 
to build binutils and have everything that's normally part of it 
disabled at configure time.


Bernd