[PATCH, PR61605, 1/2] Handle copy cycles in pass_cprop_hardreg

[Jeff Law]

On 10/16/14 03:13, Tom de Vries wrote:
> Eric,
>
> this patch is the first half of the fix for PR61605.
>
> The problem it addresses is the following: Consider this copy cycle (a =
> b; b = a):
> ...
> (insn 2 18 3 2 (set (reg/v:SI 1 dx [orig:86 yD.1749 ] [86])
>          (reg:SI 5 di [ yD.1749 ])) test.c:9 90 {*movsi_internal}
>       (expr_list:REG_DEAD (reg:SI 5 di [ yD.1749 ])
>          (nil)))
> (note 3 2 6 2 NOTE_INSN_FUNCTION_BEG)
> (insn 6 3 7 2 (set (reg:SI 5 di)
>          (reg/v:SI 1 dx [orig:86 yD.1749 ] [86])) test.c:10 90
> {*movsi_internal}
>       (nil))
> ...
>
> cprop_hardreg handles this currently in the following way:
> - it processes the first copy, and sets up di as representant of dx.
> - it then processes the second copy, and replaces the dx with di:
>    ...
>    (insn 6 3 7 2 (set (reg:SI 5 di)
>      (reg:SI 5 di [orig:86 yD.1749 ] [86])) test.c:10 90 {*movsi_internal}
>       (nil))
>    ...
>    turning it into a noop.
>
> pass_fast_rtl_dce subsequently removes the noop.
>
> However, while processing the second copy, it considers the set of di in
> insn 6 as killing, and removes di as representant of dx. So a use of dx
> in a following insn is not replaced by di.
>
> By running pass_cprop_hardreg once more after pass_fast_rtl_dce, we do
> manage to replace the use of dx in a following insn by di.
>
> This patch achieves the same, without rerunning pass_cprop_hardreg. It
> ensures in copyprop_hardreg_forward_1 that the set of a dest by a noop
> is not considered killing.
>
> Bootstrapped and reg-tested on x86_64.
>
> OK for trunk?
>
> Thanks,
> - Tom
>
> 0001-Don-t-regard-a-copy-with-identical-src-and-dest-as-k.patch
>
>
> 2014-10-13  Tom de Vries<tom@codesourcery.com>
>
> 	PR rtl-optimization/61605
> 	* regcprop.c (copyprop_hardreg_forward_1): Add copy_p and noop_p.  Don't
> 	notice stores for noops.  Don't regard noops as copies.
OK.
Jeff