[PATCH, Pointer Bounds Checker 14/x] Passes [12/n] Optimize string functions

[Jeff Law]

On 10/13/14 08:51, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
>> I had assumed the gimple_call_set_fndecl was a nop if we didn't
>> change the fndecl.  Is that not the case?
>
> Right.  But (!fndecl_nochk) doesn't mean we didn't change fndecl because there is another set to fndecl above.
Thanks for clarifying.

This is OK when the builtins are done.

jeff