[PATCH, C++] Fix PR63366: __complex not equivalent to __complex double in C++

Jason Merrill jason@redhat.com
Thu Oct 9 13:28:00 GMT 2014


On 10/09/2014 05:24 AM, Thomas Preud'homme wrote:
>>                    "ISO C++ forbids declaration of %qs with no type", name);
>>
>>         type = integer_type_node;
>> +      defaulted_int = 1;

I would think we want to handle this up in the existing defaulted_int block:

>   /* No type at all: default to `int', and set DEFAULTED_INT
>      because it was not a user-defined typedef.  */
>   if (type == NULL_TREE && (signed_p || unsigned_p || long_p || short_p))

>> +  return typeid (__complex) != typeid (__complex double);

Don't we want this to be '=='?

Jason



More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list