[Fortran, Patch] Implement IMPLICIT NONE
Tobias Burnus
burnus@net-b.de
Sat Oct 4 09:43:00 GMT 2014
FX wrote:
>>> Build and regtested on x86-64-gnu-linux.
>>> OK for the trunk?
> Looks mostly OK, but I have one question: I donât understand what the wording "Type IMPLICIT NONE statementâ is supposed to mean. Why âtypeâ?
Well, I want to distinguish "IMPLICIT NONE (external)" which only
applies to procedures from "IMPLICIT NONE" alias "IMPLICIT NONE (type)"
which applies only to variables and function (return value) types. Thus,
IMPLICIT NONE (external)
IMPLICIT integer(a-z)
is valid while
IMPLICIT NONE
IMPLICIT integer(a-z)
is not.
If you have a better suggestion for the wording â¦
Tobias
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list