[Bug libstdc++/61107] stl_algo.h: std::__inplace_stable_partition() doesn't process the whole data range
Jonathan Wakely
jwakely@redhat.com
Mon Nov 10 22:32:00 GMT 2014
On 10/11/14 23:14 +0100, François Dumont wrote:
> I introduced the random tests after Christopher Jefferson request
>to have more intensive tests on those algos. Is it the whole stuff of
>tests using random numbers that you don't like or just the usage of
>mt19937 ?
The use of random number in general.
>If second is this new version using the usual random_device
>I used so far better ?
That would be much worse because failures would not be reproducible!
>If it is the whole usage of random numbers that you don't like I will
>simply get rid of the new tests files.
Did the new tests fail before your fix to stl_algo.h?
If yes, you could extract the values generated in the case that fails
and add a test using those values (this is what I should have done for
the leaking set tests)
If no, they aren't really testing anything useful.
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list