[PATCH 00/89] Compile-time gimple-checking

[Jeff Law]

On 05/02/14 03:09, Richard Biener wrote:
>
> Well, I'd like to see both and one affects the other. Doing the const correctness thing first seems more natural to me.
> Of course both need to wait for 4.9.1.
Well, it looks like David is already on that path to some extent with 
the proposed gengtype changes.

I guess I'm just trying to figure out how to stage this stuff in.  ie, 
is it easier to go with the #89 patchkit, then followup with fixing the 
const stuff, or is it easier to first fix the const stuff, then adjust 
the #89 kit.  You're recommending the latter, which is fine with me, but 
I'd like David to chime in as well since he's doing the work :-)

jeff