[PATCH] Fix PR c++/60573
Jason Merrill
jason@redhat.com
Wed Mar 26 15:52:00 GMT 2014
On 03/25/2014 03:48 PM, Adam Butcher wrote:
> I don't follow. Are you suggesting a case like the following?
>
> struct A
> {
> struct X
> {
> struct B
> {
> void foo(auto);
> };
> };
>
> void X::B::foo(auto) {} // { dg-error "cannot define" }
> };
I meant
struct A
{
struct X
{
struct B
{
void foo(auto);
};
void B::foo(auto) {} // { dg-error "cannot define" }
};
};
Here we push both A and X for the declarator. When we get to the pushed
X, we see that the enclosing scope is A, so we break out of the loop and
don't pop either of the pushed scopes.
Jason
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list